Business Partnerships Not
Lawyers' Choice
by Martin Paskind
Among forms of business organization, lawyers probably like
partnerships least, and they recommend them to clients only
rarely. Still, thousands of partnerships exist, despite what
attorneys think of them.
Partnerships are easy to create,
which is why there are so many. A partnership is simply two or
more people in business to make a profit. You don't need legal
documents.
Undocumented deals always carry
the risk that months or years later, participants will remember
details differently. Sometimes the difference is so great that
it's hard to believe that people are talking about the same
thing.
One big job of business lawyers
is to write all this down at the beginning to avoid
misunderstandings later.
All partners have unlimited
personal liability for partnership debts. When a partnership
can't pay its bills, creditors become interested in the question
of who is a partner and who isn't.
Protecting Houses, Cars, Kids
Cheesecake Factory Inc. sold food to Triples American
Grille, a sports bar and restaurant owned by Triple Threat Inc.
Ordinarily, organization as a
corporation protects shareholders, who risk only capital
invested in the firm. That's one big attraction of corporations.
Investors don't want to risk houses, cars and kids.
Cheesecake had to get around the
corporation if it wanted to chase the owner of Triple Threat. "We didn't think," said Cheesecake, "that we were
dealing with a corporation at all. We thought the customer was a
partnership, and that John B. Baines was a partner in the
company." "Thus," said Cheesecake, "Baines
has to pay the unpaid bill."
Ultimately, Cheesecake sued. The
company won in the trial court. Raines, who definitely did not
want to be a partner, took the case up to the Court of Appeals.
Walking, Quacking and
Swimming
Trial and appellate courts ruled that Baines was a partner
by estoppel. The principle of estoppel is old and basic. It says
that if it walks, swims, quacks and has feathers like a duck,
it's probably a duck. Similarly, if it acts like a
partner, that's more than likely what it is.
Cheesecake sued under the old
Uniform Partnership Act. Because the old statute confused
people, the Legislature adopted a new statute in 1997.
The old statute said a person
who represents himself as a partner, or who consents when
someone else does so, is a partner with unlimited personal
liability for business debts. When the representation is
private, liability extends only to those who extended credit on
the strength of the representation.
If Only We Had Known
That's us, said Cheesecake. There would have been no credit
sales if we had known the sports bar was a corporation instead
of a partnership. That was because new restaurant and bar
ventures often fail.
When the business is a
corporation, vendors such as Cheesecake don't have anyone to
chase for unpaid bills. A partnership "provides some
comfort to creditors," said the appellate court.
The court decided that Baines
was a partner by looking at his conduct -- at the
"representations" that could lead a supplier to
believe he was a partner.
Representations were few.
Another member of Triple Threat, Frank Kolk, told Cheesecake at
the outset that Baines was one of three partners in the
business. Evidence suggested that Baines agreed with the
statement. Baines opened regular and payroll bank accounts in
the name of Baines: Bob, DBA Triples American Grille. Witnesses
also testified that Baines was frequently at the sports bar and
had access to the office area. Baines talked with others
about "his" sports bar and was a partner in the
business.
On the strength of those
"representations," the court held Baines personally
liable for debts of Triple Threat Inc. He received no benefit
from formation of the corporation that owned the bar and grill
business.
Making Certain
This case makes it clear that business people using a form
of organization make certain that vendors and customers know who
or what they are dealing with.
Owners of Triple Threat Inc.,
thought they protected themselves by forming a corporation in
which only their investments would be at risk in case of
failure. They got stuck because they didn't look, at least to
Cheesecake, like a corporation at all.
Results can be the same when
owners, to avoid personal liability, organize as limited
partnerships, limited liability partnerships or limited
liability companies.
For owners of such companies,
everyone, creditors and customers, should know exactly what
they're dealing with. Business cards, letterheads, invoices,
statements, contracts, sales literature and the like should be
as clear as possible about the form of organization in which you
choose to do business.
Lawyers are usually afraid of
partnerships. Clients should be careful as well.
For full details, read Cheesecake
Factory Inc. v. Baines, 37:38 N.M. Bar Bulletin 26 (Sept. 17,
1998).
Martin Paskind is an Albuquerque
lawyer. His practice emphasizes legal services to small
businesses. Questions or comments can be mailed to him in care
of the Albuquerque Journal, P.O. Drawer J, Albuquerque, N.M.
87103. This column is not intended to provide legal advice to
any specific person, or with respect to any particular problems
or situations. Paskind's columns are available online at http://www.abqjournal.com/biz/pask/default.htm
For advice on specific problems and circumstances, contact your
attorney.
|